BECKER v. SHAULL

No. 90-2132.

62 Ohio St.3d 480 (1992)

BECKER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. SHAULL; LONG ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Opinion announced February 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Calhoun, Benzin, Kademenos & Heichel and J. Eric Fleischauer, for appellees.

Sauter & Hohenberger and Wayne P. Hohenberger, for appellant Clayton Long.

Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky & Fitzgerald and Gary A. Piper, for appellants Hensons.


STRAUSBAUGH, J.

The main issue before this court is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to instruct the jury as requested with respect to R.C. 5589.06. More specifically, we are confronted with the question of whether an individual is negligent per se in altering or grading his or her premises so as to cause a diversion of water onto a public highway. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the negative.

R.C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases