1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 183 A.D.2d
  5. 183 A.D.2d 355 (1992)
 

UNION 1342 v. NIAGARA TR SYS

183 A.D.2d 355 (1992)

In the Matter of Local Union 1342 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, Respondent, v. Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 18, 1992

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence M. Meckler, Buffalo, and Jaeckle, Fleischmann & Mugel, Buffalo (Linda Joseph of counsel), for appellant.

Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, Buffalo (Eugene Salisbury of counsel), for respondent.

BOOMER, J. P., PINE, BALIO and DOERR, JJ., concur.

LAWTON, J.

This appeal concerns the proper interpretation and application of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between respondent, Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. (Metro), and petitioner, Local Union 1342 of the Amalgamated Transit Union (Local 1342). The facts are not in dispute. The last of a series of collective bargaining agreements that began in 1946 was entered into between the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases