1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 262 Ga.
  5. 262 Ga. 271 (1992)
 

HUDGENS v. BROOMBERG

S92G0173, S92G0182.

262 Ga. 271 (1992)

416 S.E.2d 287

HUDGENS et al. v. BROOMBERG et al. MANAGEMENT CLEANING CONTROLS, INC. v. BROOMBERG et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Reconsiderations Denied June 10, 1992. And June 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Young, Clyatt, Turner, Thagard & Hoffman, James B. Thagard, for appellants (case no. S92G0173).

Dillard, Landers & Bower, Daniell S. Landers, Bryant H. Bower, Jr., for appellant (case no. S92G0182).

Barhan & Dover, J. Carol Sherwood, Jr., for appellees.

WELTNER, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari in Broomberg v. Hudgens, 201 Ga.App. 524 (411 S.E.2d 521) (1991), to consider:

Whether the rule in Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (343 S.E.2d 680) (1986), is limited, as the Court of Appeals holds, to testimony "originally given ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases