1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 308 S.C.
  5. 308 S.C. 216 (1992)
 

SCCTA v. SOUTHERN BELL TEL. & TEL. CO.

23647

308 S.C. 216 (1992)

417 S.E.2d 586

SOUTH CAROLINA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, Appellant v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Steven W. Hamm as Consumer Advocate of South Carolina, MCI, and The Public Service Commission of South Carolina, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided April 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell Willoughby, John M.S. Hoefer, and B. Craig Collins, all of Law Offices of Mitchell Willoughby, Columbia, for appellant.

Fred A. Walters, of Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co., and A. Camden Lewis, of Lewis, Babcock & Hawkins, Columbia, for respondent Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co.

Marsha A. Ward, Gen. Counsel, Columbia, for respondent South Carolina Public Service Com'n.

Steven W. Hamm, Raymon E. Lark, Jr., and Nancy J. Vaughn, Columbia, for respondent Consumer Advocate.

Heard March 23, 1992.

Decided April 27, 1992.

HARWELL, Chief Justice:

Respondent Public Service Commission (the PSC) approved the application of respondent Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company (Southern Bell) for revised depreciation rates and amortization schedules. Appellant South Carolina Cable Television Association (SCCTA) alleges that the trial judge erred in upholding the PSC's rulings and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases