1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 256 N.J.
  5. 256 N.J. Super. 257 (1992)
 

POLLINGER v. LOIGMAN

256 N.J. Super. 257 (1992)

606 A.2d 1113

JOHN POLLINGER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. LARRY S. LOIGMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry S. Loigman, pro se argued the cause for appellant (Larry S. Loigman, on the brief).

Bernard M. Reilly argued the cause for respondent (Dowd & Reilly, attorneys; Bernard M. Reilly on the brief).

Before Judges KING, DREIER and GRUCCIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendant appeals from the dismissal of his libel counterclaim. On June 25, 1990 defendant, an attorney practicing in Middletown Township, made allegedly defamatory statements concerning plaintiff, at that time a sergeant in the Middletown Township police force. The statements were made at a public meeting of the Middletown Township Committee. Plaintiff, employing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases