1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 484 N.W.2d
  5. 484 N.W.2d 27 (1992)
 

STATE v. FRISINGER

No. C7-91-458.

484 N.W.2d 27 (1992)

STATE of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant, v. Virginia FRISINGER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 1, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Stanich, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Steven E. McCullough, Asst. Moorhead City Atty., Ohnstad Twichell, P.C., West Fargo, N.D., for appellant.

Peter Eric Karlsson, Moorhead, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

SIMONETT, Justice.

In its decision the court of appeals granted the defendant a new trial because, in its view, the trial court committed plain error of a prejudicial nature in failing to give, sua sponte, cautionary instructions on the appropriate use by the jury of other-crime evidence admitted against defendant pursuant to Minn.R.Evid. 404(b). State v. Frisinger, 478 N.W.2d 538 (Minn.App.1991). We hold that the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases