1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 444 (1992)
 

RUSSELL v. TATE

No. 91-1829.

64 Ohio St.3d 444 (1992)

RUSSELL, APPELLANT, v. TATE, WARDEN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor J. Russell, pro se.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Jutta E. Martin, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. An appeal rather than a writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy when challenging violations of the right to a speedy trial. In re Jackson (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 189, 522 N.E.2d 540.

Moreover, the issue of a violation of appellant's right to a speedy trial has been previously adjudicated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases