1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 65 Ohio
  5. 65 Ohio St.3d 442 (1992)
 

HOWER v. MOTORISTS MUT. INS. CO.

Nos. 92-34 and 92-277.

65 Ohio St.3d 442 (1992)

HOWER ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schnorf & Schnorf Co., L.P.A., David M. Schnorf and Christopher F. Parker, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Robison, Curphey & O'Connell and David W. Stuckey, for appellant and cross-appellee.

BROGAN, J.

The sole issue certified by the court of appeals is whether the "other insurance" provision in the Motorists policies is ambiguous and ineffective. In Curran v. State Auto. Ins. Co. (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 33, 54 O.O.2d 166, 266 N.E.2d 566, paragraph one of the syllabus, we held that where an insurer provides uninsured motorist protection as required by R.C. 3937.18, it may not avoid indemnification of its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases