IN RE APPLICATION OF HATTON

No. 92-261.

64 Ohio St.3d 440 (1992)

IN RE APPLICATION OF HATTON.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Timothy Hatton, pro se.

Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis and David Winchester Peck, for the Cincinnati Bar Association.


Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board's finding that Robert Timothy Hatton has not shown the good character required for admission to the Ohio Bar. We also agree with the board's recommendation. Therefore, Hatton's application is disapproved, and he is barred from reapplying for admission to the practice of law in this state.

Order accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases