ROTHSCHILD v. RICHLAND CTY. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

23693

309 S.C. 194 (1992)

420 S.E.2d 853

Edward ROTHSCHILD, a/k/a Ed Rothschild, d/b/a Video News, Appellant v. RICHLAND COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 10, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Louis Sirkin and Edmund J. McKenna, both of Sirkin, Pinales, Mezibov & Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, and John D. Delgado, Columbia, for appellant.

Ronald M. Childress, of Richland County Attorney's Office, Columbia, and Benjamin W. Bull, of American Family Ass'n Law Center, Tupelo, Miss., for respondent.


Heard June 5, 1992.

Decided Aug. 10, 1992.

CHANDLER, Justice:

Edward Rothschild, d/b/a Video News (Rothschild), appeals an Order holding constitutional, as applied to him, Article 8A of the Richland County Code of Ordinances. We affirm.

FACTS

Article 8A of the Richland County Code of Ordinances (ordinance) requires that sexually oriented businesses be situate in a C-3 zoning district, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases