1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 120 Wn.2d
  5. 120 Wn.2d 382 (1992)
 

NELSON v. NAT'L FUND RAISING CONSULTANTS

No. 59192-0.

120 Wn.2d 382 (1992)

842 P.2d 473

SCOTT NELSON, ET AL, Respondents, v. NATIONAL FUND RAISING CONSULTANTS, INC., ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 17, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwards, Sieh, Wiggins & Hathaway, by Charles K. Wiggins and John W. Hathaway, for petitioners.

Gary M. Abolofia, for respondents.

UTTER, J.

Maurice DeShazer and National Fund Raising Consultants, Inc. (hereafter DeShazer) assign error to a Washington State Court of Appeals decision affirming a trial court judgment that DeShazer violated the Franchise Investment Protection Act, RCW 19.100, in his dealings with Scott and Katherine Nelson. DeShazer contends he did not violate the Franchise Investment Protection Act or the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. We hold that DeShazer violated the Franchise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases