1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 80 N.Y.2d
  5. 80 N.Y.2d 419 (1992)
 

LOVELACE v. GROSS

80 N.Y.2d 419 (1992)

Shaunda Lovelace et al., Appellants, v. George Gross et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kalkines, Arky, Zall & Bernstein, New York City (Jeffrey C. Thrope of counsel), for appellants.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City, New York City (Helen P. Brown and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for George Gross, respondent.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General, New York City (Judy E. Nathan, Jerry Boone, Andrea Green and Robert J. Schack of counsel), for Cesar Perales, respondent.

Acting Chief Judge SIMONS and Judges TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and SMITH concur.

KAYE, J.

Plaintiffs, a putative class of infant children of minor mothers residing with the mothers' parents, challenge the constitutionality of Social Services Law § 131-c (2) — the "grandparent-deeming" rule — which requires that a portion of the grandparents' income be deemed available to the infants in determining their eligibility for Home Relief payments. We agree with the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases