1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 180 A.D.2d
  5. 180 A.D.2d 319 (1992)
 

CHENANGO v. BROOME COUNTY

180 A.D.2d 319 (1992)

County of Chenango, Appellant, v. County of Broome et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 18, 1992

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hancock & Estabrook (Renee L. James and David E. Peebles of counsel), for appellant.

Levene, Gouldin & Thompson (Michael R. Wright of counsel), for County of Broome, respondent.

MIKOLL, J. P., LEVINE, CREW III and CASEY, JJ., concur.

HARVEY, J.

This action concerns a disputed boundary line between plaintiff and defendant County of Broome (hereinafter defendant). An understanding of this dispute requires a brief explanation of these counties' histories. Plaintiff was created by enactment of Laws of 1798 (ch 31) from portions of Herkimer and Tioga Counties. Subsequently, by Laws of 1801 (ch 123), the Legislature divided the State into 30 counties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases