BOATRIGHT v. KANSAS RACING COMM'N

No. 67,050

251 Kan. 240 (1992)

834 P.2d 368

WILLIAM DON BOATRIGHT, Appellee, v. KANSAS RACING COMMISSION, Appellant, and RODNEY L. BOATRIGHT, Appellee, v. KANSAS RACING COMMISSION, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed May 22, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warran D. Wiebe, assistant attorney general, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant.

H. Douglas Pfalzgraf, of Pfalzgraf Law Offices, of Wellington, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee Rodney L. Boatright.

Michael E. Cleary, of Miller & Cleary Law Offices, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Vern Miller, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for appellee William Don Boatright.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

HERD, J.:

This is an appeal from the district court's judicial review of an administrative proceeding by the Kansas Racing Commission (Commission) to cancel the occupation racing licenses of William Don Boatright and Rodney L. Boatright. The Commission found the Boatrights used live lures to train racing greyhounds in violation of K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 74-8810(g) and cancelled their licenses. On appeal, the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases