Even were we to assume that petitioner is correct in arguing that he did not receive notification of the denial of his appeal of his designation as a central monitoring case within 15 days pursuant to 7 NYCRR 1000.5 (b), it is clear that petitioner did receive a copy of the decision at the time of respondents' answer. Respondents concede that the administrative appeal process is still open to petitioner; thus, petitioner must first exhaust those procedures (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF CHACON v. COUGHLIN
186 A.D.2d 300 (1992)
In the Matter of Mario Chacon, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 17, 1992
September 17, 1992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
