James Irving Shoals appeals from judgment after a jury convicted him of two narcotics offenses. He admitted three prior felony convictions and the court found a fourth true. The court imposed a 12-year state prison sentence. Appellant raises numerous points including prosecutorial misconduct, sufficiency of the evidence, sufficiency of the jury instructions, and erroneous denial of his Marsden
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SHOALS
Docket Nos. H008493, H009169.
8 Cal.App.4th 475 (1992)
10 Cal. Rptr.2d 296
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES IRVING SHOALS, Defendant and Appellant. In re JAMES IRVING SHOALS on Habeas Corpus.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 28, 1992.
July 28, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Gregory Marshall, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner.
Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Sugiyama, Assistant Attorney General, Mark S. Howell and Matthew P. Boyle, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
