1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 309 S.C.
  5. 309 S.C. 174 (1992)
 

HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS CORP. v. LEATHERMAN

23698

309 S.C. 174 (1992)

420 S.E.2d 843

HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Respondent v. Hugh K. LEATHERMAN, Grady L. Patterson, Luther L. Taylor, Jules J. Hesse, Roy E. Moss, Kiffen R. Nanney, Gus J. Roberts, and Carol Baughman, as members of the South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, and the South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Faye A. Flowers, Columbia, for appellants.

David W. Robinson, II, and Jacquelyn Bartley of Robinson, McFadden & Moore, P.C., Columbia, for respondent.

Heard March 23, 1992.

Decided August 10, 1992.

FINNEY, Justice:

Appellants, as members of the South Carolina Procurement Review Panel (Panel), appeal the circuit court's ruling that, absent the formal protest of a Chief Procurement Officer's prior decision, the Panel lacked jurisdiction to, sua sponte, conduct an administrative review, and its further holding that the Panel was without authority to conduct investigative hearings. We affirm....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases