1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 261 N.J.
  5. 261 N.J. Super. 214 (1992)
 

RIMSANS v. RIMSANS

261 N.J. Super. 214 (1992)

618 A.2d 854

HOPE SPARROW RIMSANS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AIVARS P. RIMSANS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence J. Schempp argued the cause for appellant (Cohen, Shapiro, Polisher, Shiekman & Cohen, attorneys; Mr. Schempp and David Gutin, on the brief, and Laurie H. Polinsky, of counsel and on the brief).

Neal A. Loebel argued the cause for respondent (Camden County Board of Social Services, attorneys; Mr. Loebel, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LANDAU and THOMAS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Aivars P. Rimsans appeals from an August 23, 1991 order of the Family Court which appears superficially to be only a routine confirmation of the order of a Michigan court registered in 1990 pursuant to the registration provision of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) corresponding to N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.57. The long procedural and factual history of this case, however, has required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases