Defendant's contention that the sentencing court incorrectly informed him at the plea proceedings that consecutive sentences could be imposed for his crimes of intentional murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review. Were we to review this claim in the interest of justice, we would find it to be without merit. There is no evidence in the record that defendant, represented by counsel, pleaded guilty under any misapprehension...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
