Defendant and others surrounded the complainant in the process of robbing him of his personalty. Defendant punched the complainant twice in the face, as another perpetrator instructed the complainant not to talk back.
Defendant's contention that the complainant's failure to testify on direct examination that money was taken from him renders the evidence legally insufficient to support a charge of robbery, is without merit. The theory of the People's case was that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
