1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 309 S.C.
  5. 309 S.C. 146 (1992)
 

SCN MORTGAGE CORP. v. WHITE

1858

309 S.C. 146 (1992)

420 S.E.2d 514

SCN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. Lewis C. WHITE, Sr., John R. Hart, and Summer Square, a General Partnership, and United States of America through its agent, Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. SCN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. John E. BLACKWELL, John R. Hart, and Summer Square, a General Partnership, and United States of America through its agent, Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. SCN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. Porter O. KINARD, John R. Hart, and Summer Square, a General partnership, and United States of America through its agent, Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. SCN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. Eugene C. GARVIN, Jr., John R. Hart, and Summer Square, a General Partnership, and United States of America through its agent, Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. SCN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. Lonnie A. GARVIN, Sr., John R. Hart, and Summer Square, a General Partnership, and United States of America through its agent, Internal Revenue Service, Defendants, OF WHOM Defendants Lewis C. White, Sr., John E. Blackwell, Porter O. Kinard, Eugene C. Garvin, Jr., and Lonnie A. Garvin are Appellants, and SCN Mortgage Corporation is Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided July 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris A. Ellison and Robert A. Kerr, Jr., of Buist, Moore, Smythe & McGee, Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., of Hollings & Nettles, and Barry I. Baker, of Baker & Miller, Charleston, for appellants.

Edmund H. Monteith, of Monteith & Monteith, Columbia, for respondent.

Benjamin Goldberg and E. Bart Daniel, Charleston, and Richard J. Paul, Mt. Pleasant, for defendants.

Heard April 6, 1992.

Decided July 20, 1992.

GARDNER, Judge:

SCN Mortgage Corporation instituted ten separate mortgage foreclosure actions against the above-named defendants. The cases were referred to the Master to take the testimony and report his conclusions of law and fact. In each case, the Master did take the testimony and filed a report recommending judgment against the named defendants, foreclosure of the mortgaged property, and deficiency judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases