Respondent-appellant's argument on appeal that the agency did not use diligent efforts to reunite him with his child as required under the statute, is unpersuasive. The record in this case reveals that the petitioner agency did in fact satisfy the statutory mandate (see, Matter of Sheila G.,
Respondent has failed to plan for the child's future, and has refused the assistance offered by petitioner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
