1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 187 A.D.2d
  5. 187 A.D.2d 266 (1992)
 

WAGENHALS v. WORTHINGTON CORP.

187 A.D.2d 266 (1992)

Patricia Wagenhals, Individually and as Administratrix of The Estate of Frederick C. Wagenhals, Deceased, Appellant, v. Worthington Corporation et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant Patricia Wagenhals, Individually and as Administratrix of The Estate of Frederick C. Wagenhals, Deceased, Respondent, v. Worthington Corporation et al., Defendants, and Mannesmann Demag Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 5, 1992

In light of the liberal policy favoring full disclosure (see, Gardner v Slattery-Argrett, 176 A.D.2d 515), we find that plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated the need to depose the two representatives of Worthington Corporation, Tad Tokarcyzk and John Augures. However, the costs of conducting the depositions are to be paid by plaintiff.

Defendant MDC's cross-motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases