1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 63 Ohio
  5. 63 Ohio St.3d 385 (1992)
 

NELSON v. TOLEDO OXYGEN & EQUIP.

Nos. 90-2182 and 90-2184.

63 Ohio St.3d 385 (1992)

NELSON, APPELLANT, v. TOLEDO OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE, ET AL., HUDDY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. TOLEDO OXYGEN & EQUIP. COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 15, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fuller & Henry, Martin J. Witherell and Daniel T. Ellis, for appellants.

Manahan, Pietrykowski, Bamman & Delaney and Stephen F. Ahern, for appellee Toledo Oxygen & Equipment Co.

MOYER, C.J.

Upon review, we conclude that an order compelling the discovery of alleged work-product materials is not a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02.

Appellant Nelson contends that such an order is appealable under R.C. 2505.02 because it "affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding." We agree that the qualified work-product exemption set forth in Civ.R. 26(B)(3) constitutes a "substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases