DOUGLAS, J.
The question presented for our consideration is whether the trial court and court of appeals erred in concluding that appellant was not entitled to the protections provided for in R.C. 3319.081 when the board decided to nonrenew appellant's contract as "Head Custodian." For the reasons that follow, we answer this question in the affirmative and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Pursuant to R.C. 3319.081(A), a "[n]ewly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
