STATE v. FLORES

No. 91-1040-CR.

170 Wis.2d 272 (1992)

488 N.W.2d 116

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided July 29, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert Flores, pro se. There was a reply brief submitted by Matthew H. Huppertz of Carlson & Huppertz, S.C., of Waukesha.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general.

An amicus curiae brief of the state public defender was submitted by Kenneth P. Casey, chief, appellate division.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Snyder, JJ.


BROWN, J.

Robert Flores appeals a judgment of April 10, 1991, denying his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim. At the hearing relating to the judgment, Flores asserted that his counsel withdrew from representing him without his knowledge or consent before the notice of appeal was filed. He claims that, for this reason, there was no timely appeal. The trial court held that Flores had not met his burden of proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases