1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.4th
  4. 3 Cal.4th
  5. 3 Cal.4th 1 (1992)
 

MONCHARSH v. HEILY & BLASE

Docket No. S020997.

3 Cal.4th 1 (1992)

832 P.2d 899

10 Cal. Rptr.2d 183

PHILIP I. MONCHARSH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HEILY & BLASE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

July 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Philip I. Moncharsh, in pro. per., Townsend & Townsend, Paul W. Vapnek and Mark L. Pettinari for Plaintiff and Appellant.

DeWitt F. Blase, in pro. per., Heily & Blase and John R. Johnson for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LUCAS, C.J.

We granted review in this case to decide, inter alia, the extent to which a trial court may review an arbitrator's decision for errors of law. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude an arbitrator's decision is not generally reviewable for errors of fact or law, whether or not such error appears on the face of the award and causes substantial injustice to the parties...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases