ALICEA v. NEW BRUNSWICK THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY


128 N.J. 303 (1992)

608 A.2d 218

BENJAMIN ALICEA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW BRUNSWICK THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ROBERT A. WHITE, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald K. Chen argued the cause for appellant.

Aron M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondent (Vogel, Chait, Schwartz and Collins, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

On this appeal we apply the principles declared in Welter v. Seton Hall University, 128 N.J. 279, 608 A.2d 206 (1992), decided this day, in which we hold that enforcement of an employment contract did not violate the First Amendment because the plaintiffs neither performed ministerial functions for defendant Seton Hall University nor could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases