MUSTO v. ARAKEL


184 A.D.2d 243 (1992)

Diane Musto, Respondent-Appellant, v. John Arakel et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 4, 1992


In this action brought to recover damages for false arrest and imprisonment, and for malicious prosecution, there was conflicting evidence as to whether defendant had probable cause to arrest plaintiff and thus, the issue of false arrest was properly one for the jury to determine (Parkin v Cornell Univ., 78 N.Y.2d 523, 529).

As to the cause of action for malicious prosecution, we agree with the Appellate Term. The termination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases