IN RE APPORTIONMENT OF CLINTON COUNTY

Docket No. 145250.

193 Mich. App. 231 (1992)

483 N.W.2d 448

In re APPORTIONMENT OF CLINTON COUNTY — 1991

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 9, 1992, at 9:00 A.M.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by James R. Lancaster, Jr.), for the petitioners.

Charles D. Sherman, Prosecuting Attorney, for the respondent.

Before: SHEPHERD, P.J., and MICHAEL J. KELLY and FITZGERALD, JJ.


AFTER REMAND

PER CURIAM.

This petition for review of a newly adopted apportionment plan for the Board of Commissioners of Clinton County comes before this Court for review pursuant to MCL 46.406; MSA 5.359(6). This Court by our order of January 23, 1992, struck down the plan initially adopted, because one district consisted of several townships, two of which touched only at a corner, holding that the plan violated the contiguity requirement of MCL 46.404...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases