STATE v. MILLS

No. 91-172.

62 Ohio St.3d 357 (1992)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MILLS, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 8, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J. Schaefer, for appellee.

H. Fred Hoefle and Kenneth J. Koenig, for appellant.


WRIGHT, J.

We are required by R.C. 2929.05(A) to review Mills's twenty-six propositions of law. We are also charged with making an independent review of the record to determine whether the aggravating circumstance outweighs the mitigating factors asserted beyond a reasonable doubt. Last, we must decide whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the convictions,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases