1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 81 Ohio
  5. 81 Ohio App.3d 330 (1992)
 

HILB, ROGAL & HAMILTON AGENCY OF DAYTON, INC. v. REYNOLDS

No. 13189.

81 Ohio App.3d 330 (1992)

HILB, ROGAL & HAMILTON AGENCY OF DAYTON, INC. et al., Appellants, v. REYNOLDS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County.

Decided June 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Heron and Jonathan Hollingsworth, for appellants.

John A. Cumming, for appellee.

BROGAN, Judge.

The appellants, Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Agency of Dayton, Inc. et al., appeal the judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas overruling, inter alia, their motion for reimbursement of attorney fees.

The appellants in this case, Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Company and Hilb, Rogal and its subsidiary, Hamilton Agency of Dayton, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "HRH"), are a large insurance and brokerage business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases