1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 91 Md.
  5. 91 Md. App. 316 (1992)
 

JENKINS v. CAMERON & HORNBOSTEL

No. 1069, September Term, 1991.

91 Md. App. 316 (1992)

604 A.2d 506

CARL A. JENKINS v. CAMERON & HORNBOSTEL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

April 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Trepel (Hannon & Trepel and Carl A. Jenkins, on the brief), Silver Spring, for appellant.

Duncan H. Cameron (Paul S. Haar and Cameron & Hornbostel, Washington, D.C. and William Nelson, Bethesda, on the brief), for appellee.

Argued before ALPERT, CATHELL, and DAVIS, JJ.

DAVIS, Judge.

The appellant, a member of the Maryland Bar, appeals an award of sanctions against him for abusive discovery. He presents the following issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the appellant's discovery motions were violative of the court's Protective Order and in awarding sanctions against the appellant. 2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that the appellant violated Maryland Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases