VON OUHL v. BOARD OF REVIEW


254 N.J. Super. 147 (1992)

603 A.2d 114

TAMARA VON OUHL, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 25, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Bergamo argued the cause for appellant (Bergamo & Buonocore, attorneys; Charles Bergamo, on the brief).

John C. Turi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Lewis A. Scheindlin, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; John C. Turi, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

Appellant held two part time jobs, one as an animal holder for the Bergenfield Animal Clinic and the other as a substitute teacher for the Fairview Board of Education. On July 2, 1990, the Bergenfield Animal Hospital terminated her employment. As a result, appellant applied for and began receiving unemployment compensation benefits.

On September 11, 1990, a Deputy Director of the Division of Unemployment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases