Thomas Hattersley appeals from an order dismissing his cross-complaint for failure to bring the action to trial within three years after reversal on appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.320, subd. (a)(3).) We reverse and hold the three-year period was tolled three hundred fourteen days because of courtroom unavailability. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.340, subd, (c); Chin v. Meier (1991)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HATTERSLEY v. AMERICAN NUCLEONICS CORP.
3 Cal.App.4th 397 (1992)
4 Cal. Rptr.2d 331
THOMAS E. HATTERSLEY, Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. AMERICAN NUCLEONICS CORPORATION, Cross-defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 4, 1992.
February 4, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bodkin, McCarthy, Sargent & Smith and Timothy J. Sargent for Cross-complainant and Appellant.
Kirshman & Harris and Michael S. Harris for Cross-defendant and Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.