1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 127 N.J.
  5. 127 N.J. 271 (1992)
 

MATTER OF BOZARTH

127 N.J. 271 (1992)

604 A.2d 100

IN THE MATTER OF BENNETT E. BOZARTH, JUDGE OF THE PEMBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Submitted January 28, 1992.

Remanded May 7, 1991.

Decided April 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Barry argued the cause for complainant, Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (Patrick J. Monahan, Jr., Counsel, attorney).

William J. Prout, Jr., of Tomkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld argued the cause for respondent (Hartman, Marks & Nugent, attorneys; William J. Prout, Jr. and William C. Sandelands of Tomkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld, on the letter brief).

PER CURIAM.

This action against respondent, Bennett E. Bozarth, a Municipal Court judge, arises out of a complaint filed with the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC). The ACJC found that respondent had dealt inappropriately with a defendant who was talking in respondent's courtroom, trivialized another defendant's right to counsel, and implemented an inappropriate system for handling tardy defendants. That system resulted in one defendant, who was charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases