1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 3 Cal.App.4th
  5. 3 Cal.App.4th 391 (1992)
 

HOLLOWELL v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B063236.

3 Cal.App.4th 391 (1992)

4 Cal. Rptr.2d 321

CRAIG LADON HOLLOWELL, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

February 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wilbur F. Littlefield, Public Defender, Laurence M. Sarnoff, Nina Law, Elizabeth Warner-Sterkenburg and Albert J. Menaster, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Ira Reiner, District Attorney, Donald J. Kaplan and Eugene D. Tavris, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

BOREN, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing the respondent court to grant his motion to set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995), on the ground that improper hearsay testimony was admitted at his preliminary hearing.

FACTS

In June, 1990, the voters enacted the "Crime Victims Justice Reform Act," designated on the ballot as Proposition 115. One of the provisions of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases