The trial court properly instructed the jury to consider only competent evidence, to consider the complainant's testimony regarding what an uncalled counselor allegedly told her only as it might pertain to credibility determinations, and to refrain from speculation (see, e.g., People v Jackson,
Defendant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct in summation are for the most part unpreserved for appellate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.