SZYDLOWSKI v. OHIO DEPT. OF REHAB. & CORR.

No. 91AP-1258.

79 Ohio App.3d 303 (1992)

SZYDLOWSKI et al., Appellants, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County.

Decided April 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Scott Co., L.P.A., Paul Scott and Harry R. Reinhart; Clark, Perdue & Roberts Co., L.P.A., and Scott Roberts, for appellants.

Lee Fisher, Attorney General; Berry & Shoemaker, John F. Berry, Kevin Shoemaker and D. Lewis Clark, Jr., Special Counsel, for appellee.


WHITESIDE, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Debra Szydlowski and Teresa Gould, appeal from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims and raise three assignments of error as follows:

"I. The trial court erred to plaintiffs' prejudice by ruling that a psychological aide employed by the defendant to provide psychological counseling services could not have been acting within the scope of his employment when he engaged in sexual conduct with the plaintiffs while also finding that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases