1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 129 N.J.
  5. 129 N.J. 248 (1992)
 

STATE v. SHOMO

129 N.J. 248 (1992)

609 A.2d 394

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM W. SHOMO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 1, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abby P. Schwartz, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney).

James F. Smith, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Jeffrey S. Blitz, Atlantic County Prosecutor, attorney).

Craig V. Zwillman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Attorney General of new Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

In this case the Court considers the validity of partial verdicts returned during the course of jury deliberations in a criminal trial. Here, the court treated as final a verdict on two counts of the four-count indictment against defendant, returned at the end of the first day of the jury's deliberations. The Appellate Division affirmed in an unreported opinion, one member dissenting. Defendant appeals as of right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases