JUGAN v. POLLEN


253 N.J. Super. 123 (1992)

601 A.2d 235

JOHN JUGAN AND CAROL JUGAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM POLLEN, M.D., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert Kruttschnitt, III argued the cause for appellant (Grossman & Kruttschnitt, attorneys; Eli L. Eytan, on the brief).

Richard Galex argued the cause for respondents (Garruto, Galex & Cantor, attorneys; Richard Galex, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, DREIER and GRUCCIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendant William Pollen, M.D. appeals from a default judgment entered against him in this medical malpractice case. This is our second opportunity to review plaintiff's claim. Initially, we reversed and remanded a judgment in favor of defendant Pollen based upon a jury verdict. On remand, the trial judge hearing the matter as a proof case entered judgments in favor of John Jugan for $2,041,450 and in favor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases