1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 2 Cal.App.4th
  5. 2 Cal.App.4th 364 (1992)
 

LAUBE v. STROH

Docket Nos. A050709, A052207.

2 Cal.App.4th 364 (1992)

3 Cal. Rptr.2d 779

WILLIAM C. LAUBE et al., Petitioners, v. JAY R. STROH, as Director, etc., et al., Respondents. RICHARD DE LENA, Petitioner, v. JAY R. STROH, as Director, etc., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

January 6, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Smith, Polson & Elstead, Lawrence G. Smith and John Clifton Elstead for Petitioners in No. A050709.

Michael J. Mandel and Don T. Yamamoto for Petitioner in No. A052207.

M. Armon Cooper, Kathleen R. Tichenor and Jo-Linda Thompson as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Jose R. Guerrero, Allan Yannow and Kim Settles, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondents.

OPINION

HANING, J.

In these consolidated cases, petitioners are liquor licensees who suffered suspension or revocation of their liquor licenses because they allegedly "permitted" drug sales in their establishments. Neither licensee knew or had reason to know of the drug trafficking. In each case the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Department) took action against petitioners' licenses on the basis of its interpretation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases