In March of 1990, an officer of the Monterey Police Department arrested appellant for driving under the influence of alcohol. At the police station, the officer requested that a licensed clinical technologist withdraw a blood sample from appellant. Without appellant's consent, but without force, the technologist took the sample using a standard procedure and materials he obtained from a local hospital.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FORD
Docket No. H008583.
4 Cal.App.4th 32 (1992)
5 Cal. Rptr.2d 189
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARNETT TAYLOR FORD, Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 28, 1992.
February 28, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Heisler, Stewart & Daniels, William B. Daniels and Julie E. Moore for Defendant and Appellant.
Dean D. Flippo, District Attorney, and Marie Aronson, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Sugiyama, Assistant Attorney General, Morris Beatus and Gerald A. Engler, Deputy Attorneys General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
