1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 63 Ohio
  5. 63 Ohio St.3d 296 (1992)
 

PETERS v. OHIO STATE LOTTERY COMM.

No. 91-331.

63 Ohio St.3d 296 (1992)

PETERS ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. OHIO STATE LOTTERY COMMISSION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ross F. Sprague, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, Simon B. Karas and Christopher C. Keller, for appellee and cross-appellant.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

Appellants advance several arguments in support of their position that they are entitled to the unclaimed prize money from the drawings for which they selected the winning numbers. Additionally, appellants assert that the Court of Claims erred when it allowed into evidence certain computer records over their hearsay objection. In its cross-appeal, the lottery commission renews its argument that the Court of Claims should have disqualified appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases