1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 309 S.C.
  5. 309 S.C. 37 (1992)
 

LANEY v. BI-LO, INC.

1838

309 S.C. 37 (1992)

419 S.E.2d 809

Kate G. LANEY, Respondent v. BI-LO, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided June 22, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Foster, Jr., and Linda Wohlbruck Runge, both of Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Columbia, for appellant.

Roger E. Henderson of Leppard, Henderson & Spencer, Chesterfield, for respondent.

Heard May 13, 1992.

Decided June 22, 1992.

GOOLSBY, Judge:

This is a slip and fall case. The jury returned a $60,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff Kate G. Laney against the defendant Bi-Lo, Inc. Bi-Lo appeals, contending the trial judge should have directed a verdict in its favor because the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict in Mrs. Laney's favor. We disagree and affirm.

Since this is a law case, we must view the evidence and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases