LAWYERS COOPERATIVE PUBLISHING CO. v. MUETHING

No. 91-2273

65 Ohio St.3d 273 (1992)

LAWYERS COOPERATIVE PUBLISHING COMPANY, APPELLANT v. MUETHING, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Santen & Hughes, John D. Holschuh, Jr. and Edward E. Santen, for appellant.

Zimmer, Kapor & Simon Co., L.P.A., Barry H. Zimmer and Steven E. Simon, for appellee.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

Due to the nature of the arguments presented, LCP's second proposition of law will be discussed first. LCP's argument is, in essence, that Muething's claims do not sound in tort and should be treated as warranty claims that accrued on delivery of the books and are governed by the four-year statute of limitations set forth in the Ohio Uniform Commercial Code, R.C. 1302.98 (UCC 2-725). Muething urges this court to refuse to consider LCP's contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases