1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 307 S.C.
  5. 307 S.C. 29 (1992)
 

HELSEL v. CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH

23557

307 S.C. 29 (1992)

413 S.E.2d 824

Charles F. HELSEL, Judine B. Helsel, and Helsel Realty Company, Inc., Respondents v. CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided January 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis M. Cook, North Myrtle Beach, and Roy D. Bates, Columbia, for appellant.

Howell V. Bellamy, Jr. and Preston B. Haines, III of Bellamy, Rutenberg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely & Bowers, P.A., Myrtle Beach, for respondents.

Heard Nov. 21, 1991.

Decided Jan. 13, 1992.

HARWELL, Justice:

The question presented is whether the trial judge erred in holding he was bound by findings contained in an order granting a temporary injunction. We hold he did err, and, accordingly, reverse and remand for trial.

I. FACTS

Respondents Charles F. Helsel, Judine B. Helsel, and Helsel Realty Company, Inc. (the Helsels) own beachfront...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases