WYATT v. WYATT

No. 91-1611

65 Ohio St.3d 268 (1992)

WYATT, APPELLEE, v. WYATT, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe Co., L.P.A., and Harold R. Kemp, for appellee.

Strip, Fargo, Schulman & Hoppers Co., L.P.A., Michael P. Vasko and Nancy A. Novack, for appellant.

Richard L. Fox, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio CSEA Directors' Association.


HERBERT R. BROWN, J.

This case presents a convoluted history of litigation between plaintiff and defendant to collect child support payments. However, the only issues before this court are (1) whether the Alaska judgment is entitled to full faith and credit, and (2) whether res judicata applies to the Alaska court's decision. That court found the plaintiff had consented to the CSED settling her URESA claim for less than its full amount.

There is no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases