HELSEL v. CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH

23556

307 S.C. 24 (1992)

413 S.E.2d 821

Charles F. HELSEL, Judine B. Helsel, and Helsel Realty Company, Inc., Appellants-Respondents v. The CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided January 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howell V. Bellamy and Preston B. Haines, III,`of Bellamy, Rutenberg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely & Powers, P.A., Myrtle Beach, for appellants-respondents.

Louis M. Cook, N. Myrtle Beach, and Roy D. Bates, Columbia, for respondent-appellant.


Heard Nov. 21, 1991.

Decided Jan. 13, 1992.

HARWELL, Justice:

Appellants-Respondents Charles F. Helsel, Judine B. Helsel, and Helsel Realty Company, Inc. (the Helsels) contend the trial judge erred in ruling that a street end was dedicated to the public. We affirm.

I. FACTS

The Helsels sought a declaratory judgment and an injunction prohibiting the City from exercising authority and control...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases