MAURICE S. KAPROW, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BERKELEY TOWNSHIP, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 4, 1992.
Decided March 25, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John J. Ross argued the cause for appellant (Lomurro, Davison, Eastman & Munoz, attorneys, John J. Ross and Suzette N. Berrios, on the brief).
Milton H. Gelzer argued the cause for respondent Board of Education of Berkeley Township (Gelzer, Kelaher, Shea, Novy & Carr, attorneys, Kathleen W. Hofstetter, on the brief).
Arlene Goldfus Lutz, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State Board of Education (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney, Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel, Arlene Goldfus Lutz, on the brief).
Charles W. Hutchinson, Jr. argued the cause for respondent-intervenor Robert Ciliento (Gilmore & Monahan, attorneys, Charles W. Hutchinson, on the brief).
Stephen B. Hunter argued the cause for respondent-intervenor Elementary Teaching Staff Members (Klausner, Hunter & Cige, attorneys, Stephen B. Hunter, of counsel and on the brief).
Gregory P. McGuckin argued the cause for respondent-intervenor Sheila C. McGuckin (Dasti, Murphy & Wellerson, attorneys, Gregory P. McGuckin, on the brief).
Wayne J. Oppito argued the cause for respondent-intervenors Paul Polito and Arlene Lippincott.
Before Judges MICHELS, O'BRIEN and HAVEY.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
O'BRIEN, J.A.D.
Maurice S. Kaprow, a tenured assistant superintendent previously employed by the defendant Board of Education of Berkeley Township (Local Board) appeals from a decision of the State Board of Education (State Board) dismissing as untimely his petition claiming rights to several positions in the school district by virtue of his tenure. We affirm.
On October 5, 1976, Kaprow was hired by the Local Board as an Assistant Superintendent in Charge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
